RR 1.11
RR 1.11
Comments on proposed decisions. RR 1.11(1)(1)
Where a proposed decision is prepared and circulated, comments shall be filed within 15 days of the date of the proposed decision unless a different date is specified by the examiner or commissioner. An original and one copy of the comments shall be filed with the office and one copy mailed, transmitted by facsimile, or delivered in person to each of the other parties listed in the proposed decision.
RR 1.11(2)
(2) Oral argument shall be held only where directed by the commissioner.
RR 1.11(2)(a)
(a) Requests for oral argument made by parties admitted to the proceeding prior to preparation and circulation of the proposed decision shall be included with the comments on the proposed decision.
RR 1.11(2)(b)
(b) Requests for oral argument made by an intervenor not admitted as a party to the proceeding prior to preparation and circulation of the proposed decision shall be directed to the commissioner and shall be filed within 5 days of deposit of the proposed decision in the first class mail or delivery in person to the parties to the proceeding. One copy of the request for oral argument by an intervenor under this paragraph shall be deposited in the first class mail or delivered in person to each of the other parties. Parties already admitted to the proceeding shall have until the end of the comment period provided in sub.
(1) to file comments on the admission of the intervenor as a party to the proceeding. Comments on a request made under this paragraph may be included with the comments filed under sub.
(1) or filed separately. Oral argument directed by the commissioner to be held under this paragraph shall be limited to relevant questions of law and the application of policy by the office.
RR 1.11 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1982, No. 322, eff. 11-1-82; am. (1), r. and recr. (2),
Register, August, 1986, No. 368, eff. 9-1-86; am. (1),
Register, February, 1999, No. 518, eff. 3-1-99.
RR 1.12(1)(1)
Office records shall be open and available to the public as required by ch.
19, Stats.
RR 1.12(2)
(2) Written requests for copies of office records shall be addressed to the commissioner or to the legal custodian of records.
RR 1.12(3)
(3) The fee for reproduction, photocopying, photographing, transcription or other duplication of a public record in the custody of the office may not exceed the actual, direct and necessary cost.
RR 1.12 Note
Note: The office charges the following fees: simple photocopying - 15 cents per page, cassette tape of hearing $12.00. When the cost of locating a record exceeds $50, the office charges the actual, necessary and direct costs of location. These amounts are subject to change.
RR 1.12(4)
(4) With the agreement of the record requester, the custodian of records may elect to use a private company to produce copies of records in any form. The fee for such copies shall be the actual cost charged by the private company plus the cost of any office staff labor.
RR 1.12 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1982, No. 322, eff. 11-1-82; am.
Register, August, 1986, No. 368, eff. 9-1-86; renum. from OCT 1.13,
Register, May, 1996, No. 485, eff. 6-1-96; am. (3), cr. (4),
Register, February, 1999, No. 518, eff. 3-1-99.
RR 1.13
RR 1.13
Environmental review. RR 1.13(1)(1)
Approval of construction of major railroad facilities shall be screened using a screening worksheet to determine whether an environmental impact statement is required.
RR 1.13(2)
(2) The following types of office actions shall not require an environmental impact statement:
RR 1.13(2)(d)
(d) Granting exemptions for vertical and horizontal clearances.
RR 1.13(3)
(3) Any action not specifically categorized in subs.
(1) and
(2) is presumed not to be a major action which may significantly affect the human environment. The office shall consider on an individual basis, any such action brought to its attention, and may determine that a screening worksheet is required to determine whether an environmental impact statement is needed.
RR 1.13(4)
(4) The procedure for an environmental screening shall be that outlined in ch.
PSC 4.
RR 1.13(5)
(5) If an environmental impact statement is required, it shall be prepared in the manner outlined in ch.
PSC 4.
RR 1.13 History
History: Cr.
Register, October, 1982, No. 322, eff. 11-1-82; am. (2) (intro.) and (3),
Register, August, 1986, No. 368, eff. 9-1-86; renum. from OCT 1.14,
Register, May, 1996, No. 485, eff. 6-1-96; correction in (4) and (5) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register, May, 1996, No. 485; r. (2) (a) to (d), (f) and (g), renum. (2) (e), (h) and (i) to be (2) (a) to (c), cr. (2) (d),
Register, February, 1999, No. 518, eff. 3-1-99.
RR 1.14(1)(1)
Form. Each proposed decision issued by a hearing examiner shall be in writing, with a title identifying the matter and the docket number.
RR 1.14(2)
(2) Content. Each proposed decision shall include all of the following:
RR 1.14(2)(b)
(b) Proposed ultimate conclusion on each material issue.
RR 1.14(2)(d)
(d) A proposed order setting out the duties of each party, including deadlines for work or installations required, and an apportionment of costs.
RR 1.14 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1999, No. 518, eff. 3-1-99.
RR 1.15(1)(1)
Form. Each final decision issued by a hearing examiner shall be in writing, with a title identifying the matter and the docket number.
RR 1.15(2)
(2) Content. Each final decision shall include all of the following:
RR 1.15(2)(d)
(d) An order setting out the duties of each party, including deadlines for work or installations required, and an apportionment of costs. The order is not limited simply to granting or denying a petition, but may order any reasonable method for the improvement of public safety or convenience.
RR 1.15(3)(a)
(a) The commissioner may, at any state of the proceedings, designate the examiner to render the final decision. The commissioner shall designate the examiner to render the final decision when the commissioner has recused himself or herself from participation in a proceeding. The designation shall be in writing and provided to all parties.
RR 1.15(3)(b)
(b) During any prolonged disability or absence of the commissioner, the examiner shall render the final decision in any uncontested matter. During any period in which the position of commissioner is vacant, the examiner shall render the final decision in any uncontested matter.
RR 1.15 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1999, No. 518, eff. 3-1-99.
